Raymond Dele Awoonor-Gordon: Sierra Leone Telegraph: 7 May 2019:
There is a usual angst when it comes to writing about public figures, especially when these figures are politicians who are caught in the eye of the storm. But it is funny that the dogs are out so soon to give life to the eerie omens of the immediate past.
As people continue to gawp at what is considered by some to be the logic-defying dynamism of the current administration and its comprehensible vision, I warned in my last piece that the New Direction should beware of the silly season, which is the ultimate chatter of praise and the looming scenario of disenchantment, if the under- priced matter of escalating cost of living continues to limp along without change.
Yes, some good things are happening, and several new government initiatives are welcome. But right now, radical economic stimuli are needed beyond the all-consuming songs of adoration which is exhausting the minds of everyone.
So, if what I wrote in the last piece could be perceived in some quarters as criticism of the current administration, then you can understand my contention that we as a people, aside our ingrained tendency to posture in mindless partisanship, have problems accepting the truth, not to talk of letting go of our idiosyncrasies. Why are we a sentimentally hypocritic people?
That the broken record I’ve been playing since the Koroma administration, regarding the mindset of our society is still the sound track of our today, says much about our disposition to a better Sierra Leone.
I mean, I had to do a verbal eye-roll at some reactions to the article, in which I warned the current administration to be wary of the agama lizard syndrome and not to get carried away with its performance, especially with the increasing crescendo of what Dr Sama Banya described as “D gron dry” (the ground is dry-barren-lifeless) and which President Bio himself recently acceded to in an interview.
The erudite doctor might have attributed the lamentation to members of the opposition but there is no amount of spin that will wash the fact that devoid of the heavy inflows from corruption and unethical business practices of the immediate past, the diminishing economic pinch being felt by many of the ordinary citizens is a threat that will soon begin to see some of government’s efforts as a bed of nails, by the same people whose lives have been one of trauma and which the new direction says it is trying to ameliorate.
Believe me, nestled under the bridges of the populist welfare programmes of the government are thousands of people who represent the most extreme end of our economic realities. They, beyond the enigmatic smile and face of President Bio and the razzmatazz of the fight against corruption, are the most extreme and visible symptoms of our realities and the sharpest point at the top of the iceberg,
Whether you want to believe it or not, the key element in the economy is the individual consumer. That is the irreducible minimum that we need to focus on. Until the individual’s disposable income increases, thereby expanding his effective demand, we will be dancing on a roulette wheel.
The very basic preoccupation of government is security and job creation; and overarching this, is to ensure modicum of equity. In between all these, is the necessity to fashion appropriate dynamic mechanism of maximizing the socio-economic benefits accrued to the greater number of people.
At the moment, our economy is neither fish nor fowl. Whether it is as a result of the gross incompetence of the agenda for prosperity or that of the New Direction, pales into insignificance. It is merely a luminous symbol of our realities.
Addressing corruption for example, without understanding the political economy of corruption is very dangerous and is akin to sub-optimal theorisation of the practical down-to-earth role of this debilitating scourge in keeping the scope, structure and success of the economy in the near term.
Let’s be frank, if you eliminate corruption, many will starve and die irrespective of which political garb they adorn.
To avoid this, is to amidst other things, find a social safety net for those who depend on corruption on the secondary and tertiary level for survival and implement that simultaneously with the crackdown on corruption.
One of our major mistakes I believe is that we continue to focus on the economy, especially as it relates to the ordinary man, as an abstract entity. By such thinking, all economic policies devolve to the sustenance of government and its structures.
It is a cartoon view of our existence that ignores the fact that many struggling under-privileged, sees that fact and the hype around it as something that go on and on like a seamless miasma, while their horrific lives continue to be blighted.
Despite our abundant resources, the perilously scorching bite of poverty has held us back; and that is the huge gauntlet that was thrown on the floor of our future by the change of administration last year with the frictionless flow from the APC to the SLPP.
Amidst their overwhelming desire for change, the people just want to feel the social and economic benefits of Mother Nature’s windfall on Sierra Leone.
Simply put, the current cost of living, which is now a sing song, is an albatross in a dysfunctional and dystopian society like ours, where political gladiators from the ousted APC are doing their best to hold the nation hostage with their antics and are becoming a phenomenon that handicaps cohesive fight against transformation.
Added to that is the incomprehensible behaviour of a government that is meant to be more focussed, but which does everything to get bogged down with mundane issues that are doing it no favours but simply indicates that politicians will always be politicians.
Nevertheless, as the economy bites harder, should the New Direction, after one year, still be dipping its toes in the water or continue to lean on the familiar crutch of the failure or otherwise of its predecessor?
True, the government is defying the experts and critics. But one thing is largely responsible. That thing is the change in government from those who were reckless and profligate in abundance, to a government who despite the lack, is managing and utilising lean resources efficiently.
So, the tower is still perilously standing on a solid foundation. Serious efforts are in place to avoid tremors but unless the New Direction appreciates the fact that without an urgent attention to the economy, which is affecting all aspects of business, gradually the murmurs will start.
It is not a criticism. It is an observation. The dots need connecting. The truth is that one part needs to connect to the other to work.
Yes, the APC government made a mess of the economy by its primitive plundering and despoliation of the treasury, but the current administration cannot continue to whine and blame the inertia of the economy on that and still expect not to dash the hopes of the people who are gradually streaming towards disillusionment and currently experiencing one of the toughest times in history with the cost of living reaching an all-time high.
If in doubt, take a trip to the nearest market. Prices of goods and services, including, pathetically, so-called home-grown goods, have nosed up; and typical of our economics, have refused to respond to the latter-day knee-jerk measures of the government.
Apart from the high level of greed, one of the reasons for the exit of the Koroma administration was the economic situation. Therefore, if nothing has changed, then let’s start calling a spade a spade.
Dear author, I enjoyed reading the write up until I got to this; “One of our major mistakes I believe is that we continue to focus on the economy, especially as it relates to the ordinary man, as an abstract entity. By such thinking, all economic policies devolve to the sustenance of government and its structures.”
From this sub premise, the rest of the logic could not flow in the economic sense. Focus on the economy cannot be a mistake because it is the key problem that every government around the world, including ours should be wrestling to solve. What were you try to say, just so I don’t assume wrong?
I think the author is saying, the ordinary man should not be alienated from participating actively in the development of the economy. Each and everyone should feel part and parcel of the economic structure. Government should not just focus on replenishing itself – the ordinary guy should be able to feel proud to share a little chip of the cake.
The whole country’s revenue in one account is reminiscent of the slogan: “One County One Pocket”.
I am sure things have started changing in the country for the better. It is difficult to see or measure it now. We should wait for a two year grace to see what people are saying. If the economy had been driven down the hole, the new government would find it much harder to fish anything out.
During the APC government the economy was buried down the grave. What should we do to bring it out again. This is exactly what our brother is doing in the country to almost eliminate corruption. By doing so you will see new plants growing for development.
It is high time for the president to difuse hard days to be washed away without even mimicking it. We should not forget that the APC government destroyed the country and her economy, leaving it in the hands of very few people without control. We should also know the economy and the state were practically destroyed under president Koroma APC government. I am sure our brother is doing all he can to bring Sierra Leone back to life.
MAY GOD BLESS SIERRA LEONE AND HER PEOPLE.
Abu, I respect your view by asking Sierra Leoneans for a GRACE period. But, the country can’t continue like that forever. That has to stop. The majority of Sierra Leoneans are tired of such fine words. When will the people enjoy the fruits of their PATIENCE and SUFFERING.
The first year will be HOPE, the second – GRACE as you asked, the third – PATIENT, the fourth – MERCY and the fifth – PLEASE, ONE MORE TERM. Politicians have played this card for ages now. That is not going to happen anymore. Deliver now or ?. I leave a question mark.