Sierra Leoneans are impoverished by dodgy mining
agreements
Abdul R Thomas
Editor – The Sierra Leone Telegraph
12 December 2011
The Timbergate dust is yet to settle, after the
political fracas caused by a TV documentary,
exposing the country’s vice president colluding to
defraud the state. Two of the culprits in the
corruption scandal, acting as agents for the vice
president have evaded justice, with the help of the
good offices of those running the country.
But few in Sierra Leone believe that justice will be
served. The Anti-Corruption Commission is presently
busy indicting the Mayor of Freetown, along with
senior officers of the capital city’s local
authority, after investigations revealed serious
fraud and corruption at the city council.
 |
|
Meanwhile, another Report, exposing
dodgy mining agreements signed by the
government – allowing mining companies
to exploit the country’s vast mineral
wealth, with very little return to the
people of Sierra Leone has been
published.
The Report – 'Not Sharing the Loot' is
published by the Danish Development
organisation – DanWatch, in association
with Sierra Leone’s civil society group
– Network Movement for Justice and
Development (NMJD).
|
Whilst this new Report may be excruciatingly
embarrassing for former British Prime Minister –
Tony Blair, who is not only said to be a close
friend of the president of Sierra Leone – Ernest Bai
Koroma, but a champion of good governance in Africa,
for the people of the country this is just another
nail on the coffin of their battle against poverty.
Sierra Leone is ranked among the poorest
countries in the world - at 158 out of 169 on the UN
Human Development Index in 2010. Over 70% of the
population lives on less than one dollar a day.
Government’s debt to public sector workers, which is
estimated at hundreds of millions of Leones in
unpaid salaries and benefits, is growing rapidly.
Refuse collection and street cleaning in the capital
Freetown is once again becoming a major health risk.
Mountains of rubbish seen ten years ago on major
roads in the capital Freetown, are fast returning.
Widespread intermittent supply of electricity and
water, is adding to a general feeling of misery and
impoverishment in the country.
Yet the government says there is no money. In
2002, the bulk of the country’s debt was written off
by the international community and IMF. Today, the
country’s debt is well over $800 Million and rising.
Poverty is on the increase despite vast natural
resources.

President Koroma with mining Billionaire
- Frank Timis |
|
According to the DanWatch Report;
"Government revenue from the mining
industry in Sierra Leone is limited
compared to the importance of the
industry to the country."
"Particularly, revenues from corporate
income tax and royalties are low, which
is surprising as the prices of the
minerals exported from Sierra Leone have
more than doubled over the last five
years, and therefore companies are
expected to generate profits that should
be taxed."
"The limited tax contribution from the
mining companies has huge implications
for poor people in Sierra Leone." |
The Report found that:
In 2010 the mining industry accounted for almost 60%
of exports (US$200 million), but only 8% (US$24
million) of government revenue came from the mining
sector.
Government revenue from mining accounted for only
1.1% of GDP.
Indirect taxes are the largest contributor to
government revenue, while corporate income tax,
lease and licenses and royalties constitute less
than half of total government revenue.
The biggest exporter of minerals - Sierra Rutile
pays as little as 2.2% of its export value to the
government of Sierra Leone.
Royalties are potentially the biggest source of
government revenue from the mining companies.
However, Sierra Rutile has reduced its royalty rate
from 3% to 0.5%.

President Koroma celebrating election
victory in 2007 |
|
Mining companies in Sierra Leone have
negotiated advantageous agreements with
the government, to keep their payments
to the government of Sierra Leone low.
Contracts are not in accordance with
the newly established Mines and Minerals
Act.
The top five mines in Sierra Leone are
part of company structures with
excessive use of low-tax and
high-secrecy countries, also known as
tax havens, which are particularly
useful for moving profits out of
countries of operation and reduce
corporate income tax payments.
|
Four of the five reviewed mines in Sierra Leone,
Koidu Holdings, African Minerals, Sierra Mineral
Holding and Sierra Rutile, are owned through
intermediaries based in tax havens - such as Bermuda
and British Virgin Islands.
Despite increasing global mineral prices, mining
companies in Sierra Leone hardly declare any
profits, and therefore corporate income tax revenues
are only US$ 2.4 million or 10% of total government
revenue from the mining sector.
Only one of the top five mines - Sierra Rutile,
is paying corporate income tax.
Besides the limited economic contribution, mining
impacts adversely on local communities and the
environment.
In order to ensure objectivity, transparency and
fairness in conducting their research, DanWatch
obtained data and information from several credible
sources, including; the National Revenue Authority
(NRA) of Sierra Leone; the Government’s Poverty
Reduction Strategy Paper: Progress Report 2008—10
(PRSP); sales and export figures reported in the
annual reports of companies; trade statistics from
International Trade Centre (ITC) - a joint agency of
the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations;
press releases and media articles.
DanWatch also notes that; "The report is conducted
and published in accordance with international
standards for the conduct of journalists, which
includes the right of fair comment and criticism.
The analysis of each company has been sent to the
company in order to check facts and hear their
comments. African Minerals, Sierra Rutile and
Vimetco (owner of Sierra Minerals Holding Ltd) have
been helpful in this regard."
The most serious indictment made by the Report is
with respect to the poor levels of revenue generated
by the government from mining.
The Report says that:
Government revenue from mining is collected through
various payments of royalties, taxes and levies. The
payments and rates are stipulated in the Mines and
Minerals Act of 2009 and the Income Tax Act of 2000.
These Acts constitute the fiscal and legislative
framework for mining in Sierra Leone.
However, some of the companies have negotiated
special agreements with the government, granting
them tax concessions or other benefits. The most
important sources of government revenue from mining
are:
LEASES AND LICENSES
To explore and mine an area a company needs to hold
a mining license and a lease, for which a fee has to
be paid to the government. In 2010 mining leases and
licenses accounted for US$4.4 Million or 19% of
government revenue from mining.
ROYALTIES
Royalties are charged by the following percentages
on the market value of minerals:
• Precious stones (diamonds): 6.5 % for large scale
miners and 3% for small-scale miners. For special
stones, which are defined as those with a market
value above US$ 500,000 - the rate is 15%.
• Precious metals (gold): 5%
• All other minerals: 3%
Royalties from rutile, bauxite, diamond, and gold
accounted for US$3 Million or 13 % of government
revenue from mining.
In contrast to profit-based income taxes, royalties
are generally considered difficult to evade and easy
to administer. But Sierra Leone has difficulties
monitoring the production and exports of mining
companies. In this regard, diamond-smuggling is a
particular challenge.
CORPORATE INCOME TAX
According to the Income Tax Act of Sierra Leone,
corporate income tax rate for mining companies is
37.5%, while the general company tax rate is 30%.
However, London Mining Ltd only recently had their
tax rate revised from 6% to 25%. The agreement with
African Minerals also sets the rate to 25%.
If the chargeable income of a company is below 7% of
turnover, the mining company shall pay a minimum
income tax of 3.5 % of turnover. Sierra Rutile has
negotiated a minimum turnover tax of only 0.5%,
while African Minerals is totally exempt from it.
Corporate income tax in 2010 accounted for only
US$2.4 Million or 10% of total mining revenue.
This might include payments of US$1.5 Million from
London Mining, erroneously booked as corporate
income tax. If these are deducted, total corporate
income tax from mining would only account for 4% of
government revenue.
WITHHOLDING TAXES
Withholding tax obliges the payer to withhold a
certain percentage of that payment as taxes to the
government. For example, when a mining company pays
interest on a loan, it is to withhold 15% of the
amount as taxes. A range of withholding taxes
applies to the mining sector:
• on interest 15%
• on dividends 10%
• on rents (e.g. on machinery) 10%
• on payments to resident contractors 5%
• on payments to non-resident contractors 10%
Withholding tax on payments to non-resident
contractors is the largest source of government
income from mining companies. This accounts for
US$7.8 Million or 33% of total mines revenue.
Since the publication of this Report in October
2011, there has been no official response from the
government as was the case in the alarming 'Land
Grab Report', which shows that foreign investors are
not only exploiting precious land belonging to poor
communities, but with very little or no return to
those communities.
 |
|
Sierra Leone has been an independent
nation for 50 years with very little
human progress and development to show
for its independence.
With a population of almost 6 million
and an average adult mortality rate of
47 years, rising poverty caused by
corruption and poor governance must be
urgently addressed.
|
The management of the country’s vast mineral
resources, which are yet to benefit the people of
Sierra Leone, is a key priority, if the fight
against poverty is to be won.
The DanWatch 'Not Sharing the Loot' Report makes
the following recommendations:
The government of Sierra Leone and the mining
companies should take action to uncover and unleash
the lost potential for development from the mining
sector. But also international regulation is needed
to strengthen transparency into the corporate
structure and accounts of multinational mining
companies.
THE GOVERNMENT OF SIERRA LEONE SHOULD:
• Ensure that all contracts are in accordance with
the Mines and Minerals Act and other laws - with no
exemptions or special concessions allowed.
• Review the Mines and Minerals Act in order for
Sierra Leone to harvest a larger share of the value
of exported minerals, particularly in the wave of
increasing global prices.
• Ensure full transparency into the sector, through
complying with the Extractive Industries
Transparency International Standards (EITI); make
all contracts public, and provide updated and
validated information on tax and other contributions
from the mining sector to the government.
• Ensure good and transparent governance of the
mining sector in order to harvest potential and
invest in development for poor people. Critical is
capacity development in geological, mining economics
and engineering areas; tax and revenue collection;
transparent allocation of revenues for development.
• Develop adequate and appropriate regulations
relating to resettlement, environmental management,
compensation, underground mining, community
relations, etc. and the effective monitoring of the
sector.
• Link mining to the national development agenda by
establishing a cost-benefit analysis (economic,
environmental, socio-cultural and political) prior
to deciding whether to mine or not in any location
and for any mineral.
INTERNATIONAL REGULATORS SHOULD:
• As a first step make it mandatory for extractive
industries to follow the principles of EITI -
disclosing payments to governments from each project
in a country. USA has taken the first step, now EU
and other areas should follow suit.
• Further demand full country by country reporting
from multinational companies in order to make it
transparent for the revenue authorities and the
public, for each subsidiary of multinationals (also
tax havens based) relevant information for assessing
tax payments.
This must include the beneficial owner of the
company, financial performance, sales and purchases,
number of employees, finance costs, pre-tax profits
and tax payments.
• Crack down on tax havens through demanding
automatic exchange of tax information for all
countries.
• Demand the full implementation of the UN Human
Rights Council’s Guiding Principles on Business and
Human Rights to implement the United Nations
“Protect, Respect and Remedy” Framework
THE MINING COMPANIES SHOULD:
• Disclose accounts on a country by country and
project by project level in order to enable for
citizens and governments to scrutinise the accounts,
including details on trade and investments between
subsidiaries, tax payments, profits. These accounts
should include subsidiaries in tax havens.
• Pay a fair tax according to the spirit of the laws
and avoid tax planning and exemptions aimed at
reducing taxes in Sierra Leone.
• Invest directly in Sierra Leone and avoid the use
of tax havens.
• Increase procurement of goods and services from
Sierra Leone to strengthen trickle-down effects from
the mining sector.
• Perform due diligence in relation to compliance
with national laws, international best practice,
international labour and human rights laws,
especially where the national laws and standards are
weak.
The Parliament of Sierra Leone is currently debating
president Koroma’s 2012 Budget and Financial Report.
The government’s finances have come under massive
strain due to misguided borrowing and spending,
which has left the government unable to balance its
books.
 |
|
The government needs to find over Le1 Trillion to
cover its budget deficit by the end of 2011.
Over-ambitious infrastructure projects are suffering
due to cost over-run and insufficient funds to
complete the work.
Corruption and malfeasance is estimated to be
costing the country Billions of Dollars annually.
Hospitals and community health centres are
struggling to implement the government’s free health
care programme, which has been criticised as poorly
implemented and woefully mis-managed. Desperately
needed drugs, staff and equipment are in short
supply.
The government’s free health care programme costs
over $100 Million to run, yet revenue from mining
which could pay the costs of running the entire
public sector, is a miserly US$24 million.
|
Less than 40% of children under 3 years old live to
see their fifth birthday, due to poverty, whiles
only one in three families go to bed on more than
one square meal a day.
Will president Koroma, Tony Blair’s Africa
Governance Initiative and the international
community act on this 'Not sharing the Loot' Report
before it’s too late?
Back to main list of
articles
|